bob Posted May 12, 2012 Posted May 12, 2012 (edited) I thought it might be cool if we had a competition to see the best black powder on this forumso we could do two types of testing 1) spoolette test this would tell us which one was the fasts black powder 2) base ball or golf ball test this would tell us which one has the highest gas producing black powder we would have to decide on mortar size amount of black powder and dummy shell wight if we did the base ball test if we did the spoolette we would have to decide on tube size what densidy to have the black powder ie corned has a densidy of 1.7cc/gram I would think that 1.3cc/gram would be good for this test and the wight of the black powder to be rammed what do you guys think?bob Edited May 12, 2012 by bob
Peret Posted May 13, 2012 Posted May 13, 2012 Spolette competition would be a waste of time. The winner would be the powder that was packed loosest. Golf ball test would be feasible. There are some - sort of - rules established through PGI, but I don't know where to find them.
bob Posted May 13, 2012 Author Posted May 13, 2012 that is why we would have to say somthing like thisyou must use a 1/4 inch id card bord tubeyou must have 30 mm of packed black powderyou must use x amout by wight of black powder that way we would have the black powder packed the same amout for every person we could just come up with are one rules I'd say some thin like this you must use a golf ball that wighs 50 grams you must use 5 grams total of black powderyou must use a mortar with a id of 1.75 inches you can not use a lifting cupyou can not use a lifting disc you can not use a wadeyou can not use a patch or somthing like thatbob 1
warthog Posted May 13, 2012 Posted May 13, 2012 I have the PGI rule book, though I haven't bothered to read through it, if there are rules for this sort of competition in it. Don't they have a Best BP competition at the conventions? I will look through the book and post what I find if I find anything of note. I would then props we simply use those rules rather than reinventing the wheel. Of course we can always modify their rules a but to better suit our needs. 1
AdmiralDonSnider Posted May 13, 2012 Posted May 13, 2012 In the beginning I too was exited trying to produce the fastest possible powder, but in the course of time I wanted consistent powder that did the job. For some saving a few percent lift powder may justify spending extra time and money. For me it does not.
Mumbles Posted May 13, 2012 Posted May 13, 2012 The rules are not in the PGI competition rule book as it is not a sanctioned competition as far as I know. I've actually never seen it run. If it does happen, it's probably by a group of guys and not actually ran by PGI. There aren't a lot of rules really. You use 2g of -8+12 graded powder. I really don't have the details of the mortar, if any standards actually exist. It's 1.75" ID, and fires a golfball which is around 1 5/8" OD. I thought some places sold plastic tubes in this dimension, but I couldn't find any. Skylighter sells cardboard of a suitable dimension. http://www.skylighte...ortar-tubes.htm This is all fine, but Algenco will probably kick all of our butts. 1
bob Posted May 14, 2012 Author Posted May 14, 2012 first I'd like to say hi to don I'm on pyro guide forumyes once you get better fast black powder becomes less needed but for some thins like braking shells with just bp you need hot stuff I was thinking that the type and size of the black powder would be up to the guy that is entering ie if you use bp coated grass seed or rice hulls or polveron (polveron meaning milled wetted and put through a screen) cia or corned plus mesh size would also be up to youwell if algenco wines then algenco wines but you never know some one my just pop up with some really good stuff (not me my powder is good but not really good)bob
Peret Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 We're planning to do a few rounds of Pyro Golf at the secret WPA event next week, for which we have a special tight-fit steel mortar. I'll let you know how it goes. When we tried a few shots at Winter Blast the best I could achieve was 5 seconds, which incidentally was better than Goex, so I look with some suspicion on claims of 14 seconds with 2 grams. My mate Isaac Newton reckons 14 seconds corresponds to nearly 800 feet.
Mumbles Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 There is some info in Ian von Malitz' book Blackpowder Manufacturing, Testing and Optimization. A chapter from this book is posted on Dan Creagan's website as well where there is also a bit of mention of it. Apparently the rules used to allow 4g. Are you sure these 10+ flight times were not done back then? Since it's a competition for the hottest BP, you have to standardize grain size. Otherwise you introduce other variables besides just the BP quality. I can tell you that the hottest stuff is usually screen granulated as opposed to pressed.Im sure if you wanted to dilute your entry with non-combustable fillers no one would complain though as long as you stick to the 2g limit. 1
Potassiumchlorate Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 In the beginning I too was exited trying to produce the fastest possible powder, but in the course of time I wanted consistent powder that did the job. For some saving a few percent lift powder may justify spending extra time and money. For me it does not. Although I think that my own BP is quite a bit above average, I feel that way too. I think I'll try Algenco's method with BP on rice hulls as lift. Pressing pucks (with a very improvised press), drying pucks, crushing pucks, sorting out the different powder...nay - not if coated rice hulls perform as good as Algenco claims.
AdmiralDonSnider Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 I think I'll try Algenco's method with BP on rice hulls as lift. Off topic but could you point me towards the thread where this is discussed? Sounds interesting as part of the gasses produced by grain seem to get wasted anyway.
Potassiumchlorate Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 Off topic but could you point me towards the thread where this is discussed? Sounds interesting as part of the gasses produced by grain seem to get wasted anyway. Here and here.
Algenco Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 Ned Gorski should get credit for the idea of using coted rice hulls for lift and burst, he convinced me at a club shoot last year. Coating rice hulls is a lot easier than granulating or pressing pucks, there is some dicussion that lower ratios 4/1-5/1 are even hotter than granuals or corned BP I use 5/1 with Paulownia BP at the same rate as granulated for lift Ned uses 7/1 White Pine BP for lift and adds slow flash for break
bob Posted May 15, 2012 Author Posted May 15, 2012 (edited) we could use a paper towel tube it's a snug fit for a golf ball but it would work and sines a lot of people could get them it could be a universal thinI think we should have this closed in 2 weeks in one week we could let people make up some rules and in the second week we would let people show there resolts and pronouns the winner in 14 days I don't think we should have a serting grain size (what would we do if some one wanted to enter some black powder coated rice krispes it would be way to large) I was thinking that as long as it just has the four chems ie salt peter, charcoal, sulpher, and dextrin or red gum, that any black powder would be ok. the only regulation would be what chems are in it and amount of black powder used morter size and that you use a golf ball. I know what you saying but if your going to say what grain size then you have to say what type (polveron corned riced or cia) and then you going to say what type of charcoal and on and on and on until you have so meany limits that every body has the same flight time so using two grams of lift is ok with every one?bob Edited May 15, 2012 by bob
Mumbles Posted May 15, 2012 Posted May 15, 2012 I hate to have to say this, but that last post of yours is borderline incomprehensible at times. I don't think a paper towel tube would work. It's far too thin.
Peret Posted May 15, 2012 Posted May 15, 2012 Like I said, we'll test it and report next week. If you think a paper towel tube would work, you have no conception of the pressures and forces involved, but don't take my word for it, try it. The golf ball will stay on the ground and the shreds of cardboard will land in the next county. The easiest standard tube to use would be a 12 inch by 1.9 inch fiberglass mortar as supplied with consumer 1.75 inch shells, they're all pretty much identical, and if you happen to have a consumer firework store in your area that has a shooting field alongside you can probably pick up as many as you want for free. However, I do think a consumer mortar would need 4 grams.
optimus Posted May 15, 2012 Posted May 15, 2012 Baseballs work nicely in 3" mortars, and are relatively easy to track through the air. I believe I'm still the unofficial UK champion with 12.7 seconds airtime
bob Posted May 15, 2012 Author Posted May 15, 2012 how much black powder did you use to get a 12.7 second air time?ok so about the paper towel thing 1) sorry about not making it clear i would not just drop in my powder and ball into a normal paper towel tube I would first give it a lot of spiking and then past some layers on and if that was not a noff I would just take some thin rope and wind around it and then you could bury it in the ground and then there would be NO chances of it being recked I know this sounds like a lot of work but even just spiking and burying it I think would be anof maybe I'm rong tho@ peret I don't know what it's like in your country but in Canada there is NO way you can just pick up a mortar tube that is meant for the perpis of firing somthin more then ten feet you have to use thins like steel pipe from one of are meany oil wells or use pvcif there is any thin that you think is not right with this post or any other post I have made please tell me like you did about the card bored tube thingsorry about the miss understanding from what mumbles said it sounds like there is more not right stuff in my last post can some one tell me what it is bob
dagabu Posted May 15, 2012 Posted May 15, 2012 how much black powder did you use to get a 12.7 second air time?ok so about the paper towel thing 1) sorry about not making it clear i would not just drop in my powder and ball into a normal paper towel tube I would first give it a lot of spiking and then past some layers on and if that was not a noff I would just take some thin rope and wind around it and then you could bury it in the ground and then there would be NO chances of it being recked Bob, I think you need to do a little more reading first before proposing using a paper towel tube in any manor EXCEPT to use it as the inner former for wrapping with fiberglass, phenolic resin and glass or as a mandrel for kraft paper rolled up to at least 1/4" thick. In reality, using an existing tube for reloadables (or whatever fits the best) would the best decision here to go forward with this "contest" since they are made in mass and specifying a specific label (Brothers, Black Cat etc) would keep variation down to a minimum. All in all, I don't think that there is much use for the fastest powders as they are normally exotic, hard to reproduce and provide for to vigorous of a burn for most pyrotechnical use. For fun, it would be fine but I certainly have more pressing things to do this summer such as coating rice hulls and cutting stars. With the 4th coming up quickly, i suggest that we look at this in the fall when we are taking a pyro break. -dag
bob Posted May 15, 2012 Author Posted May 15, 2012 o k it seems that ever body is mad at me right now just thought it would be cool sorry
Peret Posted May 16, 2012 Posted May 16, 2012 No, we're not mad at you. A steel pipe would make a suitable mortar, especially if you find a cold-drawn pipe and not welded. A stout extruded aluminum tube would do nicely also, or HDPE plumbing pipe. Never use PVC, it tends to shatter into razor sharp flechettes that don't show up on X-rays after they penetrate your soft wobbly bits. I didn't realize you lived in Canada, sorry.
dagabu Posted May 16, 2012 Posted May 16, 2012 Bob, You are cool with us here, you just have unrealistic expectations for a test that is ill timed partly due to the 4th celebration. As Peret says, Aluminum tubing is made to a standard ID and OD, it is not very expensive for a long lasting solution. HDPE DR 9 is 1.81" ID but is really hard to find because of the minimum amount you have to purchase up front. -dag
Potassiumchlorate Posted May 16, 2012 Posted May 16, 2012 I think it's pretty ill timed for most European members as well, as it isn't "season" for anything pyro related here during spring and summer. I like the idea, though. I remember shooting my first dummies filled with coarse salt from 2.5" mortars.
Potassiumchlorate Posted May 22, 2012 Posted May 22, 2012 (edited) Speaking of improving the BP. I got this idea: make BP as usual by milling all chemicals for three hours. Press pucks to a density of 1.7g/cc. Crush the pucks to granules. Take the meal B that you have sieved off, spray on a boiling solution of alcohol and water 25/75. Make polverone and let dry. Then mill the polverone for one hour. This will probably be extremely well integrated and can then be coated on rice hulls. By the way: I'd like to ask one of my frequent questions again. What grain size does 5:1 BP on rice hulls equal compared with grained BP with a density of 1.7g/cc? The size is more towards FA than 2FA, but since it's hollow in the middle and a bit oblong in shape, one might not compare it that way? Suggestions? Edited May 22, 2012 by Potassiumchlorate
Algenco Posted May 22, 2012 Posted May 22, 2012 I would guess it' close to FA We shot 6&8" shells this past weekend using 8% 5/1 coated hulls (made with Paulownia) , the lift was more than adequateUsing coated hulls seems to be more effecient than granulated or corned BP
Recommended Posts