asilentbob Posted December 24, 2006 Author Posted December 24, 2006 I think that i should add this formula is at some point. Originally posted by Mumbles: You're wrong about initial velocities only mattering in a vacuum, but it also doesn't matter here. Well, it matters, but it can be worked around to give a reasonably accurate. There have to be some unrealistic assumptions, but still it will be relativly accurate. First we have to assume it went straight up and straight down. Also that said tests were done in a complete vacuum, or at least no air resistance or wind. Time up will be approximatly equal to time down. Time down has an initial velocity of 0. So......... H= 1/2At^2 If you want meters use 9.81 for A, or if you want feet use 32 for A. t is of course half of your total time. So you get 67 feet.
asilentbob Posted March 6, 2007 Author Posted March 6, 2007 Originally posted by siffup may some useful info by shimizu for chrysanthemum shells: size of shell / size of main star / number of main star / burst 3" / 9mm / 150 / 35g4" / 12mm / 170 / ????6" / 15mm / 200 / 270g8" / 19mm / 260 / 770g Also note to self:Request use of info on whitabuggywhip site.AND make sure you get all the credits.
Mumbles Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 Here's another for the file. "L = length of the strip you'll needw = desired wall thickness of the tubep = paper thicknessd = diameter of the rod you roll your tube on (id of the tube)PI = 3.14159 Number of turns needed = w / p Average length of turn = PI * (d + w) hence, L = PI * w * (d + w) / p" I don't know who to directly credit. From what I can understand it is a friend of kkpaul from UKPS.
asilentbob Posted May 5, 2007 Author Posted May 5, 2007 Originally posted by Mephistos Minion here:http://www.apcforum.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=302 Gday, Wasn't sure if this belongs here, but I don't want it to get lost in the forums , so I decided here it would go, mods, if you want to move it go ahead. I did all the calculations and here is a fairly accurate table of Kraft weights to GSM (Grams Square Metre commonly used outside the USA) 30lb Kraft = 50 GSM40lb Kraft = 65 GSM50lb Kraft = 80 GSM60lb Kraft = 100 GSM70lb Kraft = 115GSM If you have another weight then here is the formula using 70lb as an example: 70/500 = 0.140.14 x 457= 63.9863.98 x 1.8 = 115 The reason it is this is: The weights for Kraft are determined by a stack of 500 24"x36" sheets (61cm x 91.4cm). So therefore each sheet weighs 70/500lbs (63.98g) because theese sheets are less than a metre square we must times by 1.8 to get it there (61 x 91.4 = 5575.4) so then 5575.4 x 1.8 = 10035 ( 1 square metre is 10000, ok its a little off but close enough if you are after standard GSM Kraft paper get the closest one). So we must also multiply the weight of the 24"x36" sheet by 1.8 to get the GSM (63.98 x 1.8 = 115.164) and there you have the weight of a meter square of 70lb Kraft. Just drop your number in place of the 70 to work out other weights not listed in the chart.
asilentbob Posted June 14, 2007 Author Posted June 14, 2007 Originally posted by Frozentech: From the Passfire chart for *single break* shells : 3 -- 15 4 -- 20 5 -- 24 6 -- 28 8 -- 34 10 -- 40 12 -- 46 The mortar length is measured from above the bottom plug. A rule of thumb is 5 times the mortar diameter for shells under 8 inches, and 4 times the mortar diameter for shells 8 inches and up. Source: Illustrated Dictionary of Pyrotechnics
pudidotdk Posted November 21, 2007 Posted November 21, 2007 My uncomplete pyro book: pyrobin.com/files/pyroshop book.doc (copy paste into URL bar)
Bonny Posted November 28, 2007 Posted November 28, 2007 I'm not sure if this is of any use to anyone, but may help in making/extracting chems or metal powders.Source:A Thousand and One Formulas by Sidney Gernsback
pudidotdk Posted November 28, 2007 Posted November 28, 2007 I'm not sure if this is of any use to anyone, but may help in making/extracting chems or metal powders.Source:A Thousand and One Formulas by Sidney Gernsback I've actually been looking for that! Thanks!
ActiveA Posted December 2, 2007 Posted December 2, 2007 I'm not sure if this is of any use to anyone, but may help in making/extracting chems or metal powders.Source:A Thousand and One Formulas by Sidney Gernsback I can't download that for some reason... When i click on it i get a ton of random symbols.
Mumbles Posted December 2, 2007 Posted December 2, 2007 I have the same problem with firefox, actually will all attachments here. Try opening it in internet explorer. I have a plug-in installed to allow me to right click and open it directly in IE. I had to use it for something else in the past, but it serves this purpose as well.
asilentbob Posted December 2, 2007 Author Posted December 2, 2007 I have FF too, and same thing happens... sometimes if i "copy image location" and paste that into a new tab it works. I thought lithium was the most active in what it can displace. Perhaps im getting confused with activity series... not electrochemical series. Or something. The serieses always throw me off... there are like 3 main ones... and it seems like authors often get them slightly wrong or something...
BPinthemorning Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 I have found alot of info on minimum mortar lenght, but the lowest id they go is 3 inches. Dose anyone know how lone my 1 inch mortar should be?
Mumbles Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 6x the ID mortar length so 6" minimum. Genernally the tube is cut 7x ID, so 6x mortar, and the final increment is filled by a standard wooden plug. A longer tube will work, and will shoot it higher. Theres a study in one of the best of AFN books, #2 I think. It's by the kosanke's, so it looks scientific without any real science behind it.
Bonny Posted December 10, 2007 Posted December 10, 2007 I use 13-14" mortars for my 1" cylinder shells. My mortars (I know not the safest) are steel pipes welded to a base.
GalFisk Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 I reposted what Bonny posted here (it's the electrochemical series). A chemical incompatibility chart would be useful on the workshop reference.
asilentbob Posted May 28, 2009 Author Posted May 28, 2009 BUMPATF field agents conversion chart Wow, its been a long time since this thread was updated. Over a year. Now there is a bit of new blood around. Perhaps some members have some new info now?
Swede Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 Not strictly pyrotechnic, but this is my most-used utility, bar none. It is called "convert" and has thousands of engineering units, readily convertible to others. Volume, mass, pressure, length; an awesome tool, highly recommended. http://www.5bears.com/convrt.jpg Download convert.zip from my web site; virus-free.
Arthur Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 www.pyroguide.com has lots of info, little of it original or credited.
Mumbles Posted December 30, 2009 Posted December 30, 2009 I thought I would toss a few things in here. I've been doing some tube rolling calculations, and I figured these values might be useful. Common Thicknesses in inches Kraft:30# - 0.003 35# - 0.0035 40# - 0.004 50# - 0.005 60# - 0.006 70# - 0.007 Poster board: 4 ply poster - 0.017 5 ply poster - 0.022 6 ply poster - 0.026 8 ply poster - 0.034 14 ply poster - 0.048 Everyday Materials: Cereal Boxes - 0.025 Paper Lunch Sack - 0.003 Grocery Bag - 0.006 Tissue Paper - .001 Manilla file folders:10pt file folder - 0.01 12pt file folder - 0.012 14pt file folder - 0.014 Random things from Fulcanelli:100lb Tagboard - 0.007 90lb Index Bristol - 0.007 125lb Tagboard - 0.009 110lb Index Bristol - 0.009 Chipboards: (Based on # of sheets per ~50lbs, sometimes given in pt which is .001")#120? #125? - 0.018 I'm not sure on the correct number for this one #90 - 0.022 #70 - 0.03 #60 - 0.035 #50 - 0.042 #45 - 0.052 #30 - 0.07 #20 - 0.1
asilentbob Posted July 10, 2011 Author Posted July 10, 2011 Lots of tables for cylindrical shells. http://www.bangkokpyro.com/shell-building.php
Recommended Posts