Draco_Aster Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 I am trying to alloy aluminium, sodium, and lead. The process requires an inert atmosphere and a temperature of 900*C. This is explained in US patent "US 6,969,417 B2" which you can get from www.freepatentsonline.com or I can email it to you.The alloy is claimed to freely catalyse water into its gasseus componets (oxygen and hydrogen). If anybody has a furnace and is capable of containing it in an inert atmosphere (helium/argon) I would like you to PM me.
Rogue Chemist Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 I have the ability to work in argon atmosphere, seal under vaccuum in a quartz tube, and place in a thermostatically controlled furnace at the lab I work at. I can go in late and do whatever. I do not have the ability to pour the molten alloy into moulds in an inert atmosphere. As soon as I can be in the lab and the post doc is not endangering everyone with uranium oxide dust(might be a week from now or so), I will seal these metals in a niobium tube under argon, seal the niobium tube in an ampoule, toss in furnace at 900 for a few hours, slowly cool, then smash open and see what happens.Sound good?I will then try to test the gasses produced with water to see if both oxygen and hydrogen are produced by sparking in an inverted testtube filled with the gassesby water displacement.
Draco_Aster Posted July 23, 2006 Author Posted July 23, 2006 Wow. I didn't think many people would have THAT kind of access to an inert furnace. Has anybody here read the patent? Seems to make sense to me. Afterall, what happens when you add sodium to water
Rogue Chemist Posted July 23, 2006 Posted July 23, 2006 I skimmed it. Not really sure that oxygen is actually formed. Only one way to find out
FrankRizzo Posted July 27, 2006 Posted July 27, 2006 Industrial ChemistryEmil Raymond Riegel5th Edition 1949Reinhold Publishing Company, New York Page 373 In the ferrosilicon process, powdered ferrosilicon containing as much as silicon aspossible (90 per cent is frequent) is added to a 20 per cent solution of causticsoda at a temperature of 80o to 90o C.; very pure hydrogen is produced.Aluminum in the form of shavings also gives hydrogen with a solution of causticsoda. An alloy of sodium and lead reacts with water to give hydrogen, again withhigh purity (hydrone)*. These three processes serve for military purposes and assupplementary plants for emergency of rapid operations. In addition to these,portable hydrogen manufacturing plants carried on truck were built for Army usein the recent war, in which methanol and steam react catalytically to producehydrogen and carbon dioxide. The reaction is exothermic, and outside heat iffurnished by flue gases which pass through the converter, heating the outside ofthe catalyst-containing tubes. The temperature in the converter is 500o F. (260oC.) The carbon dioxide produced CH3OH+H2O -> 3H2+CO2, is scrubbed out in a monoethanolamine solution. *Hydrone® is an alloy of 35% Na and 65% Pb. "Small, irregular lumps which oncontact with water yield pure hydrogen gas (2.6 cu. ft. per lb.) and leaves aresidue of lead-sponge and NaOH solution." Merck Index.
psymon Posted July 27, 2006 Posted July 27, 2006 What are you going to use the hydrogen for? I would Love to get some of this catalyst so i can make a hydrogen generator for my car. If you are successful making it can you sell me some?
FrankRizzo Posted July 27, 2006 Posted July 27, 2006 Do not run your combustion engine on hydrogen. While it will definitely work for a while, the hydrogen will pack into the crystal lattice of the metal that your engine is made of and make it brittle. Also, the water that is generated will literally rust your engine from the inside out. Run an old lawnmower engine on it for a while if you wanna experiment.
Draco_Aster Posted July 28, 2006 Author Posted July 28, 2006 I'll let you know that if it does work only small amounts are needed. But what a great source of energy, this is really for my Dad because he is really into the whole alternative energy thing and has done years of experimentation. EDIT: took out unnecessary details.
psymon Posted July 28, 2006 Posted July 28, 2006 I wasnt going to run the engine on pure hydrogen, just inject a little like described on this web page http://www.chechfi.ca/pdfs/hydrogen_injection.pdf Seems you can use 30% less fossil fuel if u put a bit of hydrogen in the mix.
Draco_Aster Posted September 7, 2006 Author Posted September 7, 2006 Sorry I have been gone for so long Any updates here Rogue? I'm sorry I'm not much of a help but....yah....I don't really have an inert furnace
Rogue Chemist Posted September 7, 2006 Posted September 7, 2006 They will allow me lab access, but it has not been safe in there for quite some time...I no longer work there, and classes have started again.So it might happen, might not. We shall see.
Can you say amateur? Posted September 12, 2006 Posted September 12, 2006 It does lower the activation energy of the reaction though correct? Seeing how you no longer need the electrical current to break the chemical bonds, I would argue that it can be called a catalyst.
h0lx Posted September 12, 2006 Posted September 12, 2006 It reacts with water, it doesen't speed up a reaction, what a catalyst does.
Rogue Chemist Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 Catalysts also can provide differernt reaction mechanisms or pathways. Or lower the activation energy(and thus increase rate like you said) of a chemical reaction. I can see this being a catalyst, but this does seem dangerously close to the sodium in the alloy reacting with water in the standard way. I am scepical until I give it a shot.
Swany Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 Yeah, seems as if the sodium would react which could perhaps form an amorphous block of Al/Pb? It would be interesting, but I doubt it. I do not see how it can be a catalyst, unless if the Na reacts, but is reduced back from hydrated Al or some whatever the whatever happens. Well, I am eager for you to try it, it you feel so inclined.
h0lx Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 yes, but catalyst needs to stay in the same form and mass after reaction;)
Swany Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 Well aware, which is why I am implying it seems odd. Everyone seems to think it odd, rightfully so I guess. Now it's going to bug me until someone tries it.
h0lx Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 also, if it would just catalyse the decomposition, and wouldn't react, you would have perpetum mobile on your hands basically...
Recommended Posts