Tweetybird88 Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 Ok, last question of the night. I was wondering the best and cheapest way to get a flash powder that I can confine but when lit, emits a very bright flash but has no report. I was thinking that I just get a lower mesh aluminum and keep the normal 70:30 ratio. Would this work?
Explosive Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 Hey! I think something that would be Mg based would work... Try it with different ratios of KNO3 like 60/40, 50/50, 40/60.Hope that helps if not maybe sticking with the 70:30 KClO4/AL but diff Meshes... But you will always have a small report...Cya
Umphrey Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 While it is very possible to make a reportless emission of light using flash powder, but if it also must be confined, it's a near impossiblity. The question is, do you truly want an inaudible flash, or just one that isn't a loud boom? If it is indeed a reportless flash you seek, one can be easily prepared using greasy coated flake aluminum. 55% Potassium Perchlorate45% Aluminum, Flake -325 mesh coated (atomized will work, but it burns much slower, more like a white lance composition.) This will still produce a report if confined, but when in a loose pile of less than 5gram, it will produce a blindingly bright light and a simple "whoosh" sound.
ewest Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 You definitely can't use regular flash in any confined way to achieve what you want. I had some leftover flash in a sandwich bag that we were disposing of and we lit it in the plastic bag while it was open and it went off like a salute. I think the way Explosive and Umphrey said would be a better alternative.
Mumbles Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 Aaron Enzer made some very nice shells as you describe. The term you are looking for is "photoflash". They produce the large quantities of light, but what seems to be low amount of gas, or slower production of gas. The low amount of gas largely reduces the boom. Granted, you probably can't contain the compositions in bottom shot containers and still expect no boom, but a normal shell should probably be just fine. I don't know how they will work on the ground. They probably still make some sound, just in the air it is hardly noticeable. I don't know if you'll be able to get away with making ground salutes with the compositions. Aluminum (20 micron; atomized)....................40Potassium perchlorate (24 micron).................30Barium nitrate (150 micron).......................30 many more:http://www.thegreenman.me.uk/pfp/flash.html
Mardec Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 BaNitrate/Al/S 4/2/1 Al is 400 mesh Al with 5-10% stearin coating. Flashes like hell, but low sound when just lit or slightly contained. Just the WOOSH.
Polumna Posted March 7, 2007 Posted March 7, 2007 hi Just try Magnesium/Sulfur 1:1,Flash is very brightand when confinement is present, u will have a VERY loud report. But don´t store it for a long time, it degrades over time. Another good and cheap formula is Kno3/mg gives a white flash and when confinement is present, there is a little bang. hope i helped u, Polumna
qwezxc12 Posted March 8, 2007 Posted March 8, 2007 What about this?... I've been trying to think of a way to use all of the Mg turnings I have...the ones that ship 50:50 with certain grades of Mg or MgAl. Here's a plastic 3" can filled with 40g Mg turnings & 30g BP pulverone. The can was glued with xylene and minimally re-enforced with 3 turns of fiberglass tape. Total can weighed 119g. It's bright, but not loud like a salute: 3in can BP Mg turnings Compare that to an identical can with 40g Mg turnings and 20g BP pulverone, but boosted with 10g Flash: 3in can BP Mg turnings salute
Mumbles Posted March 8, 2007 Posted March 8, 2007 Polumna, if you read, you would see the person is looking for a bright flash with no bang. Neither of the comps you suggested fit the bill. Please don't waste space here when you have nothing of merit to add.
DeAdFX Posted March 9, 2007 Posted March 9, 2007 I would assume a mixture of Sodium Perchlorate/Nitrate/permanganate/chlorate/percarbonate and Magnesium would produce the brightest flash. This hasn't been tested of course but sodium does produce some very intense yellows in small concentrations...
Mumbles Posted March 9, 2007 Posted March 9, 2007 Yes, sodiums do produce the brightest colors. Just think, Sodium Nitrate and Hafnium, I'm getting blind just thinking about it. However, brightness isn't the issue. It is more the getting the no to little sound that is the problem here.
Tweetybird88 Posted March 9, 2007 Author Posted March 9, 2007 I tested the normal 70:30 with 325 mesh spereical aluminum. It worked pretty good but inconsistantly. Some were just as I wanted while others made a noise and some just didnt go off at all.
durfeedog Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 I would try to find out what is used in airplane flares. they are the brightes flash that I have seen. Next to an A bomb.
SkywardBound Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 The present invention is related to extrudable black body decoy flare compositions that dramatically improve processibility while maintaining the infrared radiation intensity of conventional decoy flare compositions. More particularly, the present invention is related to such compositions that are also capable of serving as a heat-seeking missile decoys for aircraft, tanks; and trucks. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Aircraft-launched flares of various types have been used for many purposes. For example, it is often desirable to light a particular area at night. A flare may be used to produce light for search and rescue operations or for various military purposes. It is also well known to employ flares as a decoy tactic. That is, a flare may be used to cover the path of an aircraft through a particular area. One common situation is when the aircraft is encountering anti-aircraft fire. The use of a flare can distract the anti-aircraft fire sufficiently to allow the aircraft to proceed safely on its course. Anti-aircraft missiles are commonly used in modern warfare. Such missiles may be launched from the ground or they may be launched from another aircraft. Many of this type of missile are designed to seek particular types of emissions characteristic of aircraft. Such emissions often take the form of heat and infrared light. Thus, "heat-seeking" missiles are often used against aircraft. In this context, it is desirable to provide a flare that produces the type of emissions sought by the missile in order to distract the missile from the actual aircraft. Thus, flares that emit heat and infrared are well known and have been used for many years Conventional decoy flare materials have been a combination of magnesium and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE or "Teflon.RTM."). These compositions are known widely as magnesium-Teflon.RTM. flare compositions. These formulations produce a black body emission spectrum which has been used as a decoy for jet engines. Current methods of producing magnesium-PTFE flare compositions require the use of solvents that are ozone-depleting or flammable. In one currently used method, the composition is produced by depositing the binder on the pyrotechnic mixture through solvent loss using, for example, acetone or methyl-ethyl ketone. The mixture is dried, after which it is consolidated through pressing or extrusion operations. In a second method, a binder such as Viton A.RTM., which is a fluorinated ethylene propylene copolymer sold by DuPont, is deposited on the pyrotechnic mixture through polymer precipitation methods using hexane and acetone. The dried pyrotechnic powder is then consolidated through pressing or extrusion operations. This method requires large quantities of acetone and hexane, which are flammable, to carry the Viton A.RTM. binder. The solvents used in these methods have been the source of many fires during the processing of decoy mixes. An additional problem with conventional magnesium-PTFE compositions is that they are very sensitive. Moreover, such compositions require extensive operator exposure during mixer dumping, oven loading, and material break-up operations. Traditional methods have proven disadvantageous, as the processing and handling of conventional flare compositions is dangerous and has resulted in many injuries and even deaths. An additional problem with conventional magnesium-PTFE compositions is that such compositions typically require expensive ingredients such as specialty binders and spherical magnesium. Accordingly, it would be a significant advancement in the art to provide compositions and methods of producing decoy flares that overcame the identified problems of producing conventional flares. In particular, it would be an advancement to provide flare compositions that eliminate the safety risks associated with handling unconsolidated pyrotechnic powder. It would also be an advancement in the art to provide flare compositions and methods of production that eliminate ozone-depleting or flammable solvent emissions that accompany production. It would be a further advancement in the art to provide such flare compositions that could be manufactured using traditional press/extrusion techniques or using a twin screw extruder. It would also be an advancement to provide such compositions that exceed the radiometric performance of conventional magnesium-PTFE infrared decoy flare compositions. It would be a further advancement in the art to provide such compositions that cost less than conventional flare compositions to produce. Such compositions and methods for producing decoy flares are disclosed and claimed herein. SUMMARY AND OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION The present invention is related to new compositions that produce black body radiation when ignited. A black body radiator is generally defined as a material that radiates over a broad spectrum, as described by the following equation: M=ε�?T4 Wcm-2 where: ε=emissivity T=absolute temperature �?=Stefan-Boltzmann constant M=exitance The novel extrudable black body decoy flare compositions defined herein function in a manner similar to conventional magnesium-PTFE infrared decoy flares: heat produced by the flare decoys the heat-seeking missile away from the target. The principle difference between a conventional magnesium-PTFE flare composition and this new flare composition is that the compositions of the present invention utilize polyaromatic thermoplastics rather than solvent deposition fluor-polymers (e.g., Viton A.RTM.) or poly-olefins as the binder component. The polyaromatic thermoplastic facilitates the processing of the flare material via extrusion without the use of solvents. The primary reaction products of a conventional magnesium-PTFE flare are solid carbon and liquid magnesium fluoride. The high emissivities of these reaction products result in an efficient black body radiating plume. In contrast, the polyaromatic thermoplastic of the present invention pyrolyzes during flare combustion to produce carbon particles. This pyrolysis of the io binder results in an efficient black body radiator in the exhaust plume. The present invention relates to the use of polyaromatic thermoplastic compounds such as polystyrene and dimethyl phthalate as the binder in a black body decoy flare. The thermoplastic compounds enable a magnesium-PTFE flare composition to be extruded without the use of solvents. In addition, the aromatic rings are reduced to carbon in the fuel rich composition, producing an ideal incandescent species that augments the signature. Pyrotechnic art teaches that the radiometric output of traditional flare formulations is directly tied to the binder content of the flare. Low binder levels (4%) produce the greatest radiometric output and high binder levels (8%) produce lower radiometric output. One traditional method for augmenting the radiometric output of a flare formulation when higher binder levels are required is to use a fluorocarbon (such as Viton A.RTM.) or high energy binder (e.g., a polyoxetane binder such as BAMO/AMMO). This increases the oxidative potential of the binder component. Therefore, it was unexpected that high polyaromatic binder (16%) content flares produced an increased output when compared to a standard magnesium-PTFE flare. Some of the primary benefits of the present invention are enhanced processibility, increased performance, elimination of solvents, and reduction in material and labor costs. Extrusion of flares containing polyaromatic thermoplastic binders increases processibility over traditional pressed flares by eliminating oven cure time, increasing processing line speed, decreasing labor costs, and significantly reducing the risk to operators from unconsolidated pyrotechnic exposure. The radiometric output of the flare is improved over traditional pressed magnesium-PTFE flares. The use of thermoplastic binders eliminates the need to use solvents to process the flare compositions. The solvents traditionally used are ozone-depleting or flammable. Elimination of solvents increases the environmental friendliness of the process and safety to operators. Polyaromatic thermoplastics are commonly used in the manufacture of a wide variety of products ranging from coffee cups to children's toys. These materials are far less expensive than halocarbons such as Viton A.RTM. or specialty binders commonly used in the manufacture of infrared flares. Flares manufactured using compositions of the present invention are more easily demilitarized than flares manufactured using conventional compositions. Compositions utilizing polyaromatic thermoplastic binders may be removed from the flare casing by heating. This is to be contrasted with conventional flare materials which can be demilitarized only by complex and expensive mechanical or chemical processes. These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and appended claims, and upon reference to the accompanying drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating the radiometric data generated by burning a pressed baseline magnesium-PTFE decoy flare composition. FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the radiometric data generated by burning a composition within the scope of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention provides improved extrudable black body decoy flare compositions and methods of use. The compositions are capable of producing significant amounts of black body radiation. At the same time, the compositions avoid some of the problems encountered with conventional flare compositions, including the handling of unconsolidated pyrotechnic powder and solvent emissions. Additionally, flares produced according to the method of the present invention cost less to produce than conventional flares. Accordingly, the compositions of the present invention comprise a metal fuel, PTFE as the main oxidizer, and a polyaromatic thermoplastic binder. Other additives, including curing agents and burn rate modifiers, are used as is known in the art to tailor other characteristics of the composition. In summary, the present invention provides new and useful extrudable black body flare compositions. A typical flare composition according to the present invention includes the following components in the following percentages by weight: Ingredient Weight Percent Magnesium 40 to 70 Teflon .RTM. 10 to 40 Polyaromatic Thermoplastic Binder 8 to 30 Plasticizer 0 to 24 Magnesium is the fuel of choice, although other metals, such as aluminum and mixtures of aluminum and magnesium, could also be used. Magnesium is easily ignited and has a strong capability to after-burn in the plume behind the flare. This after-burning is important to augment the infrared signature of the plume without increasing the combustion chamber's internal temperature. Magnesium used in the compositions of the present invention may be chipped, spherical, or a mixture of chipped and spherical. Chipped magnesium is less expensive than spherical magnesium. It is presently preferred that the metal be in the range of from about 40% to about 70% by weight. Most formulations falling within the scope of the present invention will have metal in the range of from about 45% to about 65% by weight. Generally, good results have been obtained with formulations in Which magnesium is present at from about 64% to about 66% by weight. As in conventional magnesium-PTFE flare compositions, PTFE ("Teflon.RTM.") is the oxidizer in compositions of the present invention. It is presently preferred that PTFE be present in the range of from about 10% to about 40% by weight. Most formulations falling within the scope of the present invention will have PTFE in the range of from about 20% to about 35% by weight. Generally, good results have been obtained with formulations in which PTFE is present at about 25% by weight. The flare formulations also include a polyaromatic thermoplastic binder. In certain presently preferred embodiments, the polyaromatic thermoplastic binder is comprised of polystyrene, which is commercially available, for example, from Amoco. Acrylonitrile butadiene styrenes (ABS) may be substituted for polystyrene. The polystyrene or ABS may be plasticized using phthalates, including dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, dioctyl phthalate, poly terephthalate, and poly ethyl terephthalate. Also usable are para or ortho substituted chloropolystyrenes, nitropolystyrenes, polyacenaphthalene, polyvinylcarbozol, polyvinylfluorene, other polyvinylaromatics, α methylpolystyrenes, α chloropolystyrenes, α alkylpolystyrenes, and copolymers of polystyrene, with, for example, butadiene acrylonitrile, and acrylic acid. In certain presently preferred embodiments, the polyaromatic thermoplastic is dimethyl phthalate-plasticized polystyrene. The amount and content of the plasticizer may be varied to adjust the melting point of a flare composition. The melting point of the composition may be chosen to increase the ease of production or to meet the requirements of a specific tactical environment (e.g., a composition may be designed for long-term storage in a warm climate). Generally, the melting point of a composition decreases as the amount of plasticizer increases. Compositions with low melting points are easier to handle than compositions with higher melting points. However, compositions with low melting points do not maintain their mechanical properties as well as higher melting point compositions during high temperature (up to about 165° F.) storage. It is presently preferred that the plasticizer be present at up to about 80 weight percent of the polyaromatic thermoplastic binder. More particularly, the plasticizer is present at about 50 weight percent of the binder. It is presently preferred that the polyaromatic thermoplastic binder be present at from about 8% to about 30% by weight. More particularly, the binder is present in the range of from about 10% to about 20% by weight. Generally, good results have been obtained with formulations in which the binder is present at about 14% to about 16% by weight. The compositions of the present invention may also include conductive carbon fibrils, which reduce the composition's susceptibility to electrostatic discharge. EXAMPLES The following examples are given to illustrate various embodiments which have been made or may be made in accordance with the present invention. These examples are given by way of example only, and it is to be understood that the following examples are not comprehensive or exhaustive of the many types of embodiments of the present invention which can be prepared in accordance with the present invention. Example 1 Ingredient Weight Percent Magnesium (spherical) 66.0 Teflon .RTM. 20.0 Polystyrene 7.0 Dimethyl phthalate 7.0 This composition exceeds the radiometric performance of fielded magnesium-PTFE decoy flares. FIG. 1 illustrates the radiometric data generated by burning a pressed baseline magnesium-PTFE decoy flare composition that is within the scope of the prior art. FIG. 2 illustrates the radiometric data generated by burning this composition. A comparison of these figures demonstrates that the radiometric output of this composition exceeds the radiometric output of the conventional composition. Example 2 Ingredient Weight Percent Magnesium 64.0 (spherical or a 50-50 mixture of spherical and chipped) Teflon .RTM. 20.0 Polystyrene 8.0 Dimethyl phthalate 8.0 This composition was extruded using a ram extruder, although this composition could also be extruded using a single or twin screw extruder. SUMMARY In summary, the present invention provides new and useful black body decoy compositions and methods of use. These compositions may be extruded without the use of solvents. Such compositions overcome some of the major drawbacks of decoy flare compositions. Thus, the flare compositions of the present invention represent a significant advancement in the art. The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
TheSidewinder Posted May 4, 2007 Posted May 4, 2007 Now THAT was an interesting treatise. Nice cut and paste, wonder where it came from..... I'll add a couple words of WARNING! If what I've read elsewhere is true, finely powdered Mg (or was it Al)and finely powdered PTFE, will SELF-IGNITE if mixed directly together. At the moment, I can't remember if the caution was for Mg only, Al only, or both of them. But the result is an intense fire that can't be extinguished easily. Using water will make the "fire" an "explosion". Using CO2 won't work either, because it's burning so intensely it can strip the O2 right off the CO2 molecule and keep burning. Even Halon won't work for the same reason. (Chem Students, is this true?!?! ) M
Mumbles Posted May 4, 2007 Posted May 4, 2007 Yep, thats true. There is a fairly common chemistry demo where they burn some magnesium ribbon inside a block of dry ice. You can actually see the carbon deposited on the surface. Not sure about the Halon extinguishers, as I'm not sure what they contain. They have special extinguishers for metal fires. They contain NaCl, which melts and smothers the fire. I seem to remember them having something else in them, copper maybe?
Recommended Posts