Jump to content
APC Forum

You'll put your eye out...

  • entries
    61
  • comments
    133
  • views
    688694

The T-Cell


Swede

385 views

Since I have already named a cell the "Super Cell", I need a name for the next generation of (per)chlorate system. Pretty presumptuous, but all in good fun. An online thesaurus brought up transcendent, a pretty cool word, since I can shorten it to "T-Cell." T-Cell it is.

 

I've learned a lot about production in the weeks I've been at this, and this cell is going to take some effort. When it is complete, I think the only limiting factor will be power. It'll have many of the bells and whistles of a true industrial system, scaled down.

 

I have probably researched materials and pump systems for at least 75 hours, even going so far as to identify the correct PVC cement for this type of chemical system (Weld-on 724). I have also learned that chemical pumps, tubing, and plastics are expensive. eBay will be a big help, and already I have picked up an industrial pump (A Cole-Palmer Masterflex I/P peristaltic pump) for pennies on the dollar. Tygon tubing is the tubing of choice, and brand new Tygon for this pump runs about $4 per foot, with a 50 foot minimum being typical. I found 50 feet of Tygon formulation B-44-4X for $45 rather than $250.

 

Fittings will be CPVC or Kynar. The gasketing will probably be expanded PTFE.

 

The cell itself is going to be a challenging fabrication. PVC and CPVC are the materials of choice. The difference between the two is quite simple... CPVC plastic will withstand temperatures near boiling, whereas plain PVC needs to be kept below about 50 C. If I could afford it, I'd make the whole thing from CPVC, but CPVC is FIVE TIMES THE COST of plain PVC plastic. For example, a 12" X 12" X 3/4" thick piece of PVC will cost about $12, while a similar piece of CPVC runs upwards of $60... OUCH!!! By using CPVC only where it is necessary, and PVC for the remainder, huge $$ can be saved. And this plays very well right into the separate hot and cold section concept.

 

The theory is simple. Up to a certain point, a cell is more efficient at an elevated temperature, and that point is accelerated anode erosion. With the anodes I plan on using, I am going to seek a temperature of 60 to 70 degrees C.

 

Picture a cylindrical cell made from 4" O.D. CPVC tube. Into that tube, I can easily pack 4 typical electrodes, 2 anodes, 2 cathodes, in an electrode sandwich. They will be affixed to a CPVC lid, and the lid can be swapped. The lid will also carry a vent fitting, ports for pH probes, thermometers, etc.

 

Hot effluent from the electrode chamber (I'll call it the EC) will immediately enter my peristaltic pump. Being hot, any salts produced by the EC will remain in solution, which is necessary, given a peristaltic pump's dislike of slurries. For the pump output, options exist... it can be exhausted immediately into the collection chamber (the CC). More likely, it can be routed through some sort of heat exchanger, where heat from the EC can be dumped, and crystal growth initiated, before entering the CC.

 

The CC will be a simple, plain PVC vat, constructed of 1/2" thick grey PVC, cemented with Weld-on 724, and the joints reinforced with sections of either 1/2" PVC square stock, or angle stock. It's lid will be a simple clamp affair, as the majority of the noxious gasses will have already been vented from the EC. Crystals will/should collect only in the cool CC. Flow from CC to EC will be gravity, via either Tygon flex tube, or I think a better option would be a 1" PVC pipe equipped with a union and possibly a gate valve. The valve would allow a bit of tweaking of the fluid height for both chambers.

 

The beauty of such a system overall is that the electrode(s) (probably just the anode; plain Ti plate is excellent cathode material for both chlorate AND perchlorate) can be swapped, and the EC chamber body can pull duty for both salts. Likewise, the CC can collect chlorate or perchlorate, it doesn't care. The EC can also be disconnected, and reattached to another collection chamber, one larger or smaller. The plumbing is flexible, and can be modified with ease as opposed to a single, monolithic cell. Finally, the volume is improved. You get to add the volumes of both chambers when calculating the total.

 

Small viewing ports can be crafted from clear PVC sheet, if desired, although honestly I don't know if that is necessary. I'll probably do it "just because" and it'll add a cool touch to it. I don't know how long such a viewport would remain transparent. I suspect it'll get fogged quickly.

 

That's what's on the horizon. I definitely don't want to add up the $$ I've spent so far. It can certainly be done a lot cheaper, but I think the T-Cell is going to kick ass. It'll have a real WOW factor, with the ultimate goal being some serious production, perhaps with automated topoff of starting electrolyte, either saturated chloride, or saturated chlorate.

 

Oh yes, an obligatory picture. Text-only blogs suck, especially rambling, free-association blogs.

 

http://www.5bears.com/perc/pcrop01.jpg

 

If anyone sees any faults with this plan, COMMENT, damnit. Save me some coin. This shit's getting expensive! :P

6 Comments


Recommended Comments

pkhow

Posted

I have been reading your Blog with interest as I have been experimenting and producing Perchlorate with my MMO cell for about 18 months now. I have posted some of my results on another forum in the Past. I use a Power supply capable of up to 40 amps that I can vary the output 0 ~ 10volts. I find it easy to tell when the Perch starts the amperage drops and the voltage has to be almost doubled to maintain the same current. I have not been controlling my PH because I was not concerned about the efficiency but I will try and control this in the future. I first ran my cell at 40~50deg and accidentally let it come to the boil and was surprised to find the material survived. Since then I have been running it around 70~75deg and have not found this to have any detrimental effect on my anodes.

For a cell body I have been using 2 x clear 2.5 ltr chlorine Cell bodies that have 2 x 50mm Ports. They both come out the same side with one at the top and the other on the bottom. Both bodies are plumbed together with PVC so that they can circulate from the heat and rising Gas in the reaction chamber. I think the material is an ABS or modified acrylic but I will find out what it is. As far as I know PVC is quite suitable and can be obtained in clear tube.

I thought that most precipitating material would be in the second chamber but this has not been the case so I am looking to change the design. After I have tried a large cell I will try my dual body design again and add cooling to the second chamber this time. I have found it important to keep the electrodes high in the solution so the precipitating crystals do not bury the electrode. I have obtained a tall 30litre container that cyanuric acid ships in and so I thought I may try this next time to see how a large single cell chamber works. I am very interested in any one else’s results in cell design and method of operation.

I am keen to read any results you have had and what steps you took to get rid of any residual chlorate you had. Do you know if all the same chemical methods for removing sodium chlorate will also work with Potassium?

I must also add that my advice is to use MMO material designed for use in swimming Pool chlorinators.

I note you are getting good results with yours and are not sure what MMO you are using.

The reason I suggest this is that the normal MMO used in commercial chlorate production is used with highly saturated solutions while swimming Pools must run in salt solutions as low as 2500~3000ppm (0.025%) salt. This is very low and they have been specifically designed for operating and surviving very low concentrations of salt.

Swede

Posted

Hi pkhow, thanks for contributing. You've made some excellent observations.

 

The MMO anode I've used for chlorate is the one offered by Northstar, and it seems to perform very well. I know there are different MMO formulations, coating thicknesses, etc. You bring up an excellent point on pool chlorinators... the usual statement is that "they are not designed for chlorate manufacture and are no good", but the reality is that a HIGHER ion concentration is actually EASIER on an electrode. A typical saltwater pool runs NaCl in the range of 3,000 ppm, or 3 grams per liter, which is LOW when compared to a chlorate cell. The amperage may be kept low, but still, it says a lot about those chlorinators that they can run for years, and keep a 25,000 gallon pool disinfected with no problems.

 

I've got about 6 large, unopened boxes full of materials to fabricate the T-Cell. The materials are expensive and I want to do it right. By having separate cells (that are plumbed together) you have some control over heat, and I do very much want to create a system that will hopefully form crystals in a cool cell, and have the electrodes in a hot cell. I think forced circulation will go a long way into making that a reality. Since I have one main pump, I have been debating whether to pump electrolyte INTO the hot (electrode) cell, or OUT OF that cell. The answer came simply, fabricate it in such a way so that the system can be tried in both configurations. A high-flow through the electrode region should hopefully keep crystals from forming on them.

 

On purifying the perchlorate - I haven't tried it yet. My raw perc batch is bagged and waiting. I have both indigo carmine and phenylanthranilic acid for testing purposes. KClO4 crystals are just about the perfect recrystallization candidate. My best guess is that chlorate destruction methods apply equally to both sodium and potassium, so long as the salt is fully dissolved, and the obvious time to destroy the chlorate is during recrystallization of the raw perchlorate. The salts dissociate into ions anyhow, so the target ion (chlorate - ) is swimming about in solution regardless of which alkali metal it belonged to. The sodium might be more convenient as it is so much more soluble than the potassium, but I'd think both will work. My tests along those lines will be in a few days, and I will report on them.

 

It is obviously crucial for any oxidizer bagged and labeled as perchlorate to be truly chlorate-free, and it would be incredibly irresponsible to sell perc that is not clean. I'm not saying you are doing that, at all! Just that I sometimes wonder about bargain perchlorates out there, just how clean are they? It will be nice to be able to use a sensitive test, and one of the first candidates will be 5lb of commercial perchlorate that I bought a while back.

 

Again, thanks for posting, I hope more people do as well.

pkhow

Posted

I wanted to find what potential there was to damage (passivate) my MMO coating in a Perch cell. I knew in a low salinity chlorine cell that I must avoid exceeding the voltage and make sure the salt levels do not go too low and that this now is extremely low at less than 1 ~ 1.5ppm. I can say I tried several different constructions and running methods of my Perchlorate looking for the telltale increase resistance and MMO coating loss. My conclusion so far is that steps should be taken to minimize crystallized material encasing and bridging anode to cathode as this was the only way I found to end the life of the electrode. This will also happen with a chlorine cell when calcium is allowed to build up so much that it bridges the anode and cathodes together. For this I think you are on the right track with keeping the solution moving I am just not sure why you want to run it cool. I think experimenting so you can stop crystal from forming on the anodes is essential. On the voltage of the cell I know that regardless of the concentration 10 volts is as high and you should go and I keep mine under 9 volts. If you are not getting the current you need then the only option is to increase surface area or bring the electrodes closer. You can use more than 1 cell in series in separate containers or float internal electrodes in between the outer anode and cathode. If you do this you must join a floating anode or cathode or uses dual Polarity MMO that can operate as anode on one side and cathode on the other. I am interested to know the size of your anode and what amperage you are running it at?

I hope your Blog encourages others to try MMO anode and suggest they ask the recommended salinity of the material they are purchasing.

Swede

Posted

I DON'T want to run the cell cool! I specifically want to run a dedicated, small electrode cell pretty hot, then pump that into a cool cell for crystallization. Efficiencies go up with temperature. I'm going to shoot for 60 to 80 C in the vicinity of the electrodes, then pump that into a collection vat, possibly through a heat exchanger.

 

It should be pretty easy to regulate the temp in the electrode cell by increasing or decreasing the pump volume. My peristaltic pump is variable, and can go from a trickle to something like 8 liters per minute.

pkhow

Posted

My thoughts are that a cooling tank needs to be large enough so that it gets plenty of time to cool and easy to remove the material. With a slow flow it will give this plenty of time and also back ino the bottom of the reaction cell slowly enough not to drop the temp. On the other hand you want a lot of movement to stop cyrstal formation on the electrodes. What do you think about a stirrer pump as well?
Swede

Posted

I think stirring or agitation in any form is a great idea, bordering on essential. I had a bit of a breakthrough when I remembered, from my days of keeping a reef aquarium, that a ridiculously simple bubbler works admirably to circulate and stir.

 

My second cell, the tall acrylic tower, was a perfect example. Powered on, the top 5 inches was an opaque white emulsion of evolved gasses; below that, crystal-clear electrolyte. The walls of the cell near the electrodes was very hot, while below, it barely warmed up. This makes sense as brines are especially responsive to heat gradients. Cool brine sinks quickly. Thus my system was in two layers, a hot and a cold layer.

 

A length of PTFE tube was routed through the lid, all the way to the bottom. A cheap aquarium air pump and a check valve was plumbed, and the PTFE tube became a bubbler. This immediately produced a uniform electrolyte. Importantly, I think it helped keep evolved chlorine gas in suspension, promoting dissolving of the gas, and this in turn keeps pH where it's supposed to be.

 

When I make this cell, I am going to drill and tap, probably 1/4 tapered pipe thread, several ports in the lid that will simply be utility ports. If not used, these are easily capped with PVC plugs. Otherwise, they can be used to route bubbler or pump tubes, and keep things well-stirred.

 

A true stirrer setup would work great, but with a 40 liter or smaller tank, I think a bubbler would do fine and be 1/10th the cost.

×
×
  • Create New...