Static fuel testing - like WHAT!?
Last 5 tests have completely failed. Massive explotions.
So clearly there was something very wrong with my design and decided to investigate it a bit more.
It always seemed to me, that well published 65/35 % of sugar and KNO3 is too aggressive and with too quick burning speed. And my tests have actually proved it now. Plus, I got extremely good information on how the grain actually burns and the place of ignition is highly important!!!
Take a look to these two videos below. Both grains are with the same length and with (6cm and 5cm) and with same core size (2mm).
1) Slow motion, 240fps - fuel with 65/35 ratio
Please look carefully what happens!!!! Ignition is done from top -> fire quickly advances to the bottom, ignites the whole bottom and pushes the grain out of the fuselage. Like what? And the place where the ignition happened, is not burning at all!!!
2) Standard speed. Fuel with 60/40 ratio
First video clearly demonstrates two main issues with my current design:
1) Ignition from top with 65*35 ratio clearly does not work. Fuel is pushed to the nozzle followed by explotion.
2) Burning is extremely fast, it's way too quick for rocket engine.
Second video show nice flame, very high temperature and much much slower burn speed.
Back to the drawing board.
1 Comment
Recommended Comments