Beautiful day to cook some wood.
Looks like I'll try this blog thing out.
It was a gorgeous day so decided to cook some Paulownia using the old retort method with kettle grill and briquets. I wanted a fresh batch of external heat retort cooking of Paulownia charcoal for burn speed testing vs. Paulownia cooked with the TLUD method. TLUD will cook any size or shape of wood but maybe a bit too much. I found that using TLUD on Paulownia produces charcoal that is structurally weak and falls apart easily when removed from retort. It's still charcoal but not the same result as traditional retort cooking. With the traditional retort method, the charcoal sticks are stronger in structure retaining basic original shape but still cooked throughout. They are light and "ting" when struck together. The TLUD sticks did not exhibit these same qualities at all. MrB has pointed out that too much of the wood volatiles are cooked off using the TLUD cook. Do these same volatiles contribute to the strength of the charcoal product and TLUD indeed overcooks the larger Paulownia sticks?
Using chunks or sticks of wood in the TLUD results in longer cook time (20-30 mins) as well as higher heat. This probably causes volatiles to be burned off before all the wood is completely cooked at the bottom of retort. Going to find someone who has a power plane and make some Paulownia shavings and try TLUD with those. When using pine shavings, the cook is very quick (5-6 mins.) and consequently, the total heat is lower and the end charcoal is structurally sturdy. Paulownia shavings may produce a stronger charcoal similar to pine shavings in TLUD and less volatile burnoff.
Going to switch over to BP production in the coming nice days and make batches using the TLUD vs. traditional retort Paulownia charcoal. I'm thinking I will find the TLUD Paulownia to be inferior but it needs testing with the chronograph.
5 Comments
Recommended Comments